Greatchickenman wrote:My IQ is 450.
My emotional intelligence is over five thousand!!!
Moderators: Porter, EmperorJeramyu, Telephalsion
Sarcasm wrote:Greatchickenman wrote:My IQ is 450.
My emotional intelligence is over five thousand!!!
Sage Of The Wise wrote:This sounds like the beginning of a sitcom. Think about it: "Coming this fall to Fox, Ralphie and the Hooker".
EmperorJeramyu wrote:Sarcasm wrote:Greatchickenman wrote:My IQ is 450.
My emotional intelligence is over five thousand!!!
Yeah, Sarcasm. Applying that to things that are actually quantified by numbers is a step in the right direction, but that's still a lousy-tie in.
Sarcasm wrote:EmperorJeramyu wrote:Sarcasm wrote:Greatchickenman wrote:My IQ is 450.
My emotional intelligence is over five thousand!!!
Yeah, Sarcasm. Applying that to things that are actually quantified by numbers is a step in the right direction, but that's still a lousy-tie in.
Caught by my clever trap like a fly, you are, notice I wrote five thousand.
pwnt lawl
EmperorJeramyu wrote:Sarcasm wrote:EmperorJeramyu wrote:Sarcasm wrote:Greatchickenman wrote:My IQ is 450.
My emotional intelligence is over five thousand!!!
Yeah, Sarcasm. Applying that to things that are actually quantified by numbers is a step in the right direction, but that's still a lousy-tie in.
Caught by my clever trap like a fly, you are, notice I wrote five thousand.
pwnt lawl
Right, that's why I didn't explicitly say "the over 9000 thing", I just said "that", painting a broader scope.
Another word comes to mind when you say brilliant. But I'll be nice and not say it.Sarcasm wrote:Ah, but I haven't used 1s, or more then 3 marks.
I am fucking brilliant
Impossible wrote:Who = subject (he, she, the thing taking the action)
Whom = object (him, her, the thing having an action done to it)
Damn people who butcher languages whom I hate.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests